بررسی نقش تعدیلگری سرمایۀ فکری بر رابطۀ چابکی و عملکرد سازمان (مورد مطالعه: ادارۀ کل آموزش و پرورش شهرستان‌های استان تهران)

نوع مقاله: پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد، دانشکدۀ مدیریت و حسابداری، پردیس فارابی دانشگاه تهران، ایران

2 استادیار، دانشکدۀ مدیریت و حسابداری، پردیس فارابی دانشگاه تهران، ایران

3 استادیار، دانشکدۀ مدیریت، دانشگاه تهران، ایران

چکیده

مقالۀ حاضر به بررسی اثر سرمایۀ فکری بر رابطۀ چابکی و عملکرد سازمان در ادارۀ کل آموزش‌وپرورش شهرستان‌های استان تهران پرداخته است. روش انجام تحقیق توصیفی- پیمایشی و روش نمونه‌گیری به روش در دسترس است. جامعۀ آماری شامل 260 نفر است که تعداد 155 نمونه انتخاب و توسط پرسش‌نامۀ استاندارد فرضیات تحقیق بررسی شده است. ارزیابی و تجزیه‌وتحلیل داده‌ها با مدل‌سازی معادلات ساختاری و نرم‌افزار Smart-pls (حداقل مربعات جزئی) انجام گرفته است. نتایج حاکی از اثرگذاری مثبت و معنی‌دار سرمایۀ فکری بر رابطۀ چابکی و عملکرد سازمان (به میزان 7/23 درصد) و به‌طور مستقل بر چابکی سازمان و بر عملکرد سازمانی (به‌ترتیب به میزان 3/72 و 7/33 درصد) دارد. همچنین نتایج اثر مثبت و معنی‌دار چابکی بر عملکرد سازمانی (به میزان 6/42 درصد) را نیز تأیید کرده است. در پایان، برای بهبود سرمایۀ فکری و چابکی در سازمان مورد تحقیق، پیشنهادهایی مطرح شده است.



 

کلیدواژه‌ها


  1. احمدیان، مجید و قربانی، رحیم. (1392). بررسی رابطۀ بین سرمایل فکری و عملکرد سازمانی: مورد مطالعه وزارت امور اقتصادی و دارایی. مجلۀ اقتصادی. 11 و 12: 130-111.
  2. حسنی، محمود. استادی، سجاد. کاظمی‌قلعه، روح‌اله. (1393). بررسی رابطۀ بین مدیریت سرمایه‌های فکری و چابکی سازمانی بانک رفاه کارگران (مطالعۀ موردی: امور شعب استان آذربایجان شرقی). اولین کنفرانس بین‌المللی اقتصاد، مدیریت، حسابداری و علوم اجتماعی. ایران، گیلان.
  3. شجاعی، عبدالناصر. (1389). بررسی ارتباط سرمایۀ فکری و عملکرد سازمانی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد سنندج با استفاده از معادلات ساختاری. دانشگاه آزاد واحد سنندج.
  4. 4.       Ashrafi, N. Xu, P. Kuilboer, J-P. and Koehler, W. (2006). Boosting Enterprise Agility via IT Knowledge Management Capabilities. Proceedings of the 39th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences
  5. Akarova, S. and Fox, B. (2012) Infusing Agility into a Government Organization. Availible: http://www.governmentciomagazine.com/2012/12/infusing-agility-government-organization
  6. Atuahene-Gima, K. (2003). The effects of centrifugal and centripetal forces on product development speed and quality: how does problem solving matter?.Academy ofManagement Journal. 46(3): 59-73.
  7. Behn, R, D. (2003). Why Measure Performance? Different Purposes Require Different Measures. Public Administration Review. 63(5): 586–606.
  8. Bontis, N. (1998). Intellectual capital: an exploratory study that develops measures and Models. Management Decision. 36(2): 63-76.
  9. Bontis, n. keow, W. and Richardson, S. (2000). intellectual capital and business performance in Malaysian industries. Journal of intellectual capital. 1(1): 85-100.
  10. Bontis, N. Seleim, A. and Ashour, A. (2007). Human capital and organizational performance: a study of Egyptian software companies. Management Decision. 45(4): 789-801.
  11. Cameron, K. and Whetten, D. (1983). Organizational effectiveness: One model or several? InCameron, K., & Whetten, D. (eds.) Organizational effectiveness: A comparison of multiplemethods. New York, Academic Press: 1–24
  12. Campbell, B,A. Coff, R. and Kryscynski, D. (2012). Rethinking sustained competitive advantagefrom human capital. The Academy of Management Review. 37(3): 376-395.
  13. Carton, Robert,b. (2004) Measuring Organizational Performance: An Exploratory Study.PHD thesiss. A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of The University of Georgia in Partial. Athens, Georgia
  14. Chen,J. Zhu,Z. and Xie,Y,H. (2004). Measuring intellectual capital: a new model andempirical study. Journal of Intellectual capital. 5(1): 85-100.
  15. Chen, M. Cheng, S. and Hwang, Y. (2005). An Empirical Investigation of the Relationship Between Intellectual Capital and Firms Market Value and Financial Performance. Journal of Intellectual Capital. 6 (2): 159-176.
  16. Chen, W.-H. and Chiang, A.-H. (2011). Network agility as a trigger for enhancing firm performance: a case study of a high-tech firm implementing the mixed channel strategy. Industrial Marketing Management. 40(4): 43-51.
  17. Chin, W,W. (1998). Issues and opinion on structural equation modeling. MIS Quarterly. 22(1): **-**
  18. Choudhury, J. (2010). Performance Impact of Intellectual Capital: A Study of Indian it Sector. International Journal of Business and Management. 5(9): 72-80
  19. Ebben, J,J. and Ohnson, A,J. (2005). Efficiency, flexibility, or both? Evidence linking strategy toperformance in small firms. Strategic Management Journal. 26(13): 49-59.
  20. Fornel, C. & Larcker, D,F. (1981). Evaluting structural equations models with unobservable variables and measurement eror. Journal of Marketing Research. 18(1): 39-50
  21. Flamholtz, E,G. Bullen, M,L. and Hua, W. (2002). Human resource accounting: a historical perspective and future implications. Management Decision. 40(10): 947 – 954.
  22. Ganguly, A. Nilchiani, R. And V.Farr, J. (2009) Evaluating agility in corporate enterprises. International Journal Production Economics. 118: 410–423
  23. Ghafuri, P. Farhadi A.Mansouri, A. (2014). Relationship between Intellectual Capital and Organizational Agility with Mediatory Role of Employee Empowering in Service Sector (Case Study: Karafarin Insurance Company). International journal economic management and social science. 3(12): 11-15.
  24. Gogan, L-M. and Draghici, A. (2013). A model to evaluate the intellectual capital. Procedia Technology 9: 867–875.
  25. 25.    Harty, H. P. (1999). Performance Measurment Principles and Tchniques. In E. Berman (ED.). Public Sector Performance: Management, Motivation, and Measurment 304-328. Colorado. Westview Press.
  26. Hur, Y. (2007). Organizational Performance, Turnover, and Human Resource Management: Focusing on Municipal Police Services. PHD Thesiss. University of Kentucky Doctoral Dissertations. USA.
  27. James, L. (2012). What is Organisational Performance? Available: http://www.growth.pitcher.com.au/resources/articles/what-is-organisational-performance.
  28. Johannessen, J-A. Olsen, B. and Olaisen, J. (2005). Intellectual capital as a holistic management philosophy: a theoretical perspective. International Journal of Information Management 25: 151–171.
  29. Karamat, A. (2013). impact of leadership on organizational performance (a case study of D & R cambric communication). M.A Thesiss. University of applied sciences.
  30. Khalique, M. Bin Shaari, J, A, N. Bin Md. Isa. A, H. Binti Samad, N. (2013) Impact of Intellectual Capital on the Organizational Performance of Islamic Banking Sector in Malaysia. Asian Journal of Finance & Accounting. 5(2): 75-83
  31. Komnenic, B. and Pokrajcic, D. (2012). Intellectual capital and corporate performance of MNCs in Serbia. Journal of Intellectual Capital. 13(1): 106-119.
  32. Mention, A-L. and Bontis, N. (2013). Intellectual capital and performance within the banking sector of Luxembourg and Belgium. Journal of Intellectual Capital. 14(2): 286-309
  33. Parker, S. and Barlett, J. (2008). Toward agile government, State service authority
  34. Pavlou, P. and El Sawy, O.A. (2004). Understanding the'Black Box' of Dynamic Capabilities: A missing Linkto theStrategic role of the IT in TurbulentEnvironment. http://www.agsm.ucr.edu/faculty/pages/pavlou/MS_P AVLOU_ELSAWY_REV3.pd
  35. Qumer, A. Henderson-Sellers, B. (2008). An evaluation of the degree of agility in six agile methods and its applicability for method engineering. Information and Software Technology 50: 280–295
  36. Ricceri, F. (2008). Intellectual Capital and Knowledge Management (Strategic management of knowledge resources). Taylor & Francis e-Library. New York
  37. 37.    Richard, p,j. Devinney, T, M. Yip, G, S. and Johnson, G. (2008). Measuring Organizational Performance as a Dependent Variable: Towards Methodological Best Practice. Journal of Management. 35(3): 718-804.
  38. Roos, J. Roos, G. Dragonetti, N.C. and Edvinsson, L. (1997). Intellectual capital: navigating the new business landscape. London: Macmillan Press
  39. Roslender, R. (2009). So tell me again … just why would you want to account for people?.Journal of Human Resource Costing & Accounting. 13(2): 143-153.
  40. Sambamurthy, V. Bharadwaj, A. and Grover, V. (2003). Shaping agility through digital options: reconceptualizing the role of IT in contemporary firms. MIS Quarterly. 27(2): 37-63.
  41. Schneider, A. (2004). IT Perspectives: The key Characteristics of Enterprise Agility. Gartner ResearchGroup Avalibal: http://www.gartner.com/4_decision_tools/measurement/measure_it_articles/dec01/mit_kcea.jsp
  42. Sharifi, H. and Zhang, Z. (1999). Amethodology for achieving agility in manufacturing organizations:Anintroduction. International Journal ofProduction Economics. 62(1/2): 7-22
  43. Swink, M., Narasimhan, R. and Kim, S.W. (2005). Manufacturing practices and strategy integration: effects on cost efficiency, flexibility, and market-based performance. DecisionSciences. 36(3): 427-57.
  44. Tenenhaus, M. Vinizi, V, E. Cgatelin, Y,M. and Lauro, C (2005). PLS path modeling. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis. 48(1): 159-205.
  45. Vishnu, S. and Gupta, V,K. (2014). Intellectual capital and performance of pharmaceutical firms in India. Journal of Intellectual Capital. 15(1): 83-99.
  46. Wang, Z. Wang, N. and Liang, H. (2014) Knowledge sharing, intellectual capital and firm performance. Management Decision. 52(2): 230-258
  47. Yang, C. and Liu, H-M. (2012). Boosting firm performance via enterprise agility and network structure. Management Decision. 50(6): 1022-1044.
  48. Zanjirchi, S, M. Sayyadi Tooranlo, H. and Zeidabadi Nejad, Leili (2010). International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management. Dhaka, Bangladesh: 144-156
  49. http://www.enotes.com/homework-help/what-concepts-organizational-structure-performance-372878